Labor Day
The rain might have held the attendance down on Labor Day, but it sure didn't
dampen the spirit of the marchers and Laborfest participants. It was especially
exciting for Jodi Saggio, a sister from PACE 7-209 who won the drawing for a
brand new Harley Sportster.
Judging by the number of politicians that frequented this year's festival, it
was clear to see they obviously felt Labor will play a big part in the primary
election in September and the November 5th general election. Even politicians
who notoriously have turned their nose up and snubbed working people were there
trying to court some votes from the very same people they've ignored all of
these years. One thing has become very clear over the years, that unless you get
people in political office that support working people we'll never have things
addressed that are important to us. (For example: health care cost, prescription
cost, family medical leave, ergonomic issues and the right to organize)
This year, as in every year, check the voting records on issues that are
important to you and other working families. Get out to support those
candidates, and encourage your friends and neighbors to do the same. If we want
things to change for the better WE have to force that change.
Flight Attendants
For those of you who were not able to attend Laborfest or see the parade and
interviews on TV the parade was led by the Flight Attendant from Midwest Express
Airlines. If you get the chance to support those attendants, please do so. From
all the unbiased reports that we are able to hear, Midwest Express has not been
fair to those employees at all. Their salaries range from a beginning of $
18,000 per year to somewhere around $ 36,000 per year for the most senior.
The company has been dragging out the contract talks for 3 years. During that
time, the attendants have not received a raise, while the rest of the company
does. Now the management tries to hide behind the 9-11-01 terrorist attack,
trying to say that they are going through tough times. While it is obvious that
airlines as a whole have suffered, they had 2 years before that to agree to a
contract. It appears that they are trying to break the Union rather than
negotiate with it.
Briggs
We are being told by the insurance department that in certain E.P.O. plans we
could see some increases. The cost increases at the Aurora clinics were held to
only the additional contribution that the Company makes, However utilization has
increased which will result in increased premium costs for members. We are
waiting to review the data from the Company. This is one area the Company hopes
to reduce costs by opening the clinic at the Burleigh plant.
Rumor Mill
The Vice-President of Milwaukee operations held informational meetings to try
and squelch some of the rumors that have circulated through the plant. He
addressed the issue about Briggs entering into a partnership with another
company to run the Die Cast division. He also stated that if this plan came to
fruition, it would be moved some where in the Milwaukee area, and would be using
our people to run the operation. He stated it would take about one year to
transition the division to a new location. If this would happen, the Company
then has a tentative plan, to move the operations in the south building of the
Burleigh plant to the area that Die Cast would vacate. The plan then calls for
them to tear down the two-story building on the south end of the plant.
Right now this is a plan, but has not yet been finalized. The Company has
said that they will notify the Union if this happens, and before it goes to the
press. Our course of action will be to have the Joint Board notify all the
stewards and the stewards will then relay the message to our members in their
area.
At Menomonee Falls, the Company continues to move forward in the area of a
measured daywork system. The Union was initially introduced to this earlier this
year. As of the time of this writing, nothing further has been discussed. There
are several things that will have to be agreed to before the Union accepts this
change in our system. Things liketimed movements, accepted values, allowances
and rate of pay. Another thing that Menomonee Falls management has yet to
address is, their future plans for doing business after the lease runs out with
Harley. For a while, the Falls plant was rumored to be moving to the Burleigh
plant. With all the other changes planned for the Burleigh plant one can only
wonder where the Service Division could fit out there, now that the north end of
the plant is being leased to Generac for storage and the future of the south end
being up in the air, pending the Die Cast partnership.
The Union received three WARN notices from Briggs in the last three months.
All the reduction from those notices will take place in October. M-8 will reduce
13 jobs around October 1st. M7P will reduce nine jobs about Oct. 18th and the
last one will reduce ten jobs in F7X and one in M7X. I know this is disturbing
to hear but it will get worse before it gets better. We still have a few more
machining jobs from the north end of the Burleigh plant that will be moved along
with the green line, which will go down at the end of the year. The EX engine
that the Company touted for coming to the north end of the Burleigh plant has
been pushed back another 9 months. Originally scheduled for July 2004, the new
date is now April of 2005.
Briggs employees have called asking about an E.V.A. check because Briggs
reported a good 4th quarter. Unfortunately the E.V.A. fell short: The best
figures we could come up with, the Company’s NOPAT – (Net Operating Profit
After Taxes) was about $ 75 million, it would have to be somewhere in the $ 99
million range for our E.V.A. to kick in. These are the figures our financial
secretary came up with, and he watches the earnings very closely. No E.V.A.
bonus for our members at Briggs.
Strattec
Layoffs have created problems with some members not being allowed to bump
lateral or down in their own department. Job consolidation has only been
completed in 2 areas, and even in those areas the Company is not being
consistent when applying the contract. The Union had filed some policy
grievances pertaining to these issues. One grievance was settled prior to the
September 4th third stage meeting. At the time this article was written, we had
not received an answer on the other policy grievances that were heard. One issue
that has become very volatile is the discussions we’ve had on training. The
Company has trained some lower senior people while ignoring requests from more
senior members, to be trained. This has caused problems at the time of layoffs
because the Company wants to bypass seniority and base it’s layoffs on
qualifications. The Union argued this was not acceptable because, in the skilled
trade area, there is no job preference. Managers assign jobs to our members, and
if they are not given the opportunity to learn different jobs, they should not
be punished for that reason. The Company did say that they would review their
training policy.
Arbitration Update
The Union and the Company have met three times in attempting to resolve the
outsourcing grievance before it goes to arbitration, which is scheduled for two
days in mid-October. Also October 14th is the arbitration date set for an
employee who was discharged because of their erratic and threatening behavior.
This case was scheduled for July 31st but was postponed due to an emergency in
the arbitrator’s family.
The Union and Company are at odds over the interpretation of jobs that are
eliminated. We feel the elimination language is clear on page 33 of the contract
where it states "employees affected, by a job or jobs sent out of the
plant". The Company has contested that the indirect jobs are not to be
considered job elimination.
Their own inconsistent application of this has caused confusion. The Company
claims some jobs are being cut back due to a reduction in orders. That being the
case, the Company should be posting a voluntary layoff for those particular
jobs.
In my opinion, the Company recently has been consulting with their attorney
on so many things, leading to more conflict. Because of this, it seems that Karl
is able to get fewer things settled causing the grievance process to get pushed
through many more stages.
The Union also had a discussion with the Company regarding severance offers.
At our last meeting on September 4th, 2002 the Company had not considered making
any offers of severance. The Union made it’s case about the Company’s
responsibility to make the offers. They said they would get back to us after
they discussed this issue amongst themselves.